PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAB vs. QUBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALAB vs. QUBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 120.70% return, which is significantly higher than QUBT's -3.22% return.


ALAB

1D
-0.09%
1M
57.79%
YTD
120.70%
6M
146.66%
1Y
309.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QUBT

1D
0.20%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-3.22%
6M
-17.59%
1Y
-40.47%
3Y*
77.69%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAB vs. QUBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
120.70%25.60%152.00%
QUBT
Quantum Computing, Inc.
-3.22%-38.01%1,339.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAB and QUBT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALAB:

$66.51B

QUBT:

$2.22B

EPS

ALAB:

$1.48

QUBT:

-$0.21

PS Ratio

ALAB:

66.09

QUBT:

428.61

PB Ratio

ALAB:

44.52

QUBT:

1.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALAB:

$1.00B

QUBT:

$4.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALAB:

$760.99M

QUBT:

-$667.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

ALAB:

$253.12M

QUBT:

-$52.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAB vs. QUBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAB
ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QUBT
QUBT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QUBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QUBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAB vs. QUBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALABQUBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.99

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

-0.58

+5.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

-0.89

+10.42

ALAB vs. QUBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the QUBT Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAB and QUBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALAB vs. QUBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum QUBT drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and QUBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALABQUBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-97.53%

+33.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.19%

-74.37%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-61.33%

+61.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.48%

-72.90%

+43.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.50%

48.67%

-18.17%

Volatility

ALAB vs. QUBT - Volatility Comparison

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) have volatilities of 32.05% and 33.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALABQUBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.05%

33.55%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.52%

67.37%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.04%

103.81%

-7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.49%

133.05%

-39.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.49%

177.48%

-83.99%

Dividends

ALAB vs. QUBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAB nor QUBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALAB vs. QUBT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astera Labs, Inc. and Quantum Computing, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
308.36M
3.69M
(ALAB) Total Revenue
(QUBT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAB and QUBT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUBT has higher volatility (33.55%) compared to ALAB (32.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs QUBT's -97.53%.

ALAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAB and QUBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer