PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAB vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAB vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 140.39% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 15.95% return.


ALAB

1D
0.73%
1M
30.32%
YTD
140.39%
6M
135.29%
1Y
358.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
15.95%
6M
14.16%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
22.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAB vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
140.39%25.60%152.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
15.95%20.77%17.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAB and QQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024

0.52

The correlation between ALAB and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAB vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAB
ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAB vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALABQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.00

2.71

+3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

10.01

+1.81

ALAB vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAB and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALAB vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALABQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-82.97%

+19.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.19%

-11.96%

-48.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.04%

-4.66%

-4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.17%

-32.72%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.47%

3.23%

+27.24%

Volatility

ALAB vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a higher volatility of 30.74% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 9.17%. This indicates that ALAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALABQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.74%

9.17%

+21.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.69%

14.54%

+55.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.57%

17.95%

+78.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.72%

22.69%

+71.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.72%

22.41%

+71.31%

Dividends

ALAB vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

ALAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAB and QQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALAB has higher volatility (30.74%) compared to QQQ (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

ALAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAB and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer