PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAB vs. KNSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALAB vs. KNSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 87.08% return, which is significantly higher than KNSA's 80.22% return.


ALAB

1D
3.85%
1M
-27.77%
6M
106.63%
YTD
87.08%
1Y
127.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
112.28%

KNSA

1D
-4.94%
1M
18.22%
6M
69.26%
YTD
80.22%
1Y
145.67%
3Y*
57.85%
5Y*
37.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.26B$1.54B$1.91B
$68.75M$54.52M$46.86M

ALAB vs. KNSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
87.08%25.60%152.00%
KNSA
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
80.22%108.54%0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAB and KNSA is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALAB:

$53.35B

KNSA:

$5.67B

EPS

ALAB:

$1.48

KNSA:

$1.00

PE Ratio

ALAB:

210.48

KNSA:

74.38

PS Ratio

ALAB:

56.25

KNSA:

7.14

PB Ratio

ALAB:

37.74

KNSA:

9.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALAB:

$1.00B

KNSA:

$840.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALAB:

$760.99M

KNSA:

$546.22M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALAB:

$253.12M

KNSA:

$111.62M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAB vs. KNSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ALAB
ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

KNSA
KNSA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KNSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNSA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
KNSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNSA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ALAB vs. KNSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALABKNSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.52

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

6.94

-4.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.03

24.13

-20.10

ALAB vs. KNSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the KNSA Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAB and KNSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALAB vs. KNSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum KNSA drawdown of -83.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and KNSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALABKNSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-83.06%

+19.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.19%

-21.12%

-39.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.57%

-8.13%

-27.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.00%

-40.09%

+11.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.79%

6.06%

+25.73%

Volatility

ALAB vs. KNSA - Volatility Comparison

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a higher volatility of 34.17% compared to Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA) at 26.47%. This indicates that ALAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALABKNSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.17%

26.47%

+7.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.73%

41.55%

+36.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.79%

49.77%

+51.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.32%

54.77%

+40.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.32%

64.34%

+30.98%

Dividends

ALAB vs. KNSA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAB nor KNSA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALAB vs. KNSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astera Labs, Inc. and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ALAB vs. KNSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Astera Labs, Inc. and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ALAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.14M and revenue of 308.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

KNSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. reported a gross profit of 220.03M and revenue of 243.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.3%.

ALAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.83M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

KNSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. reported an operating income of 27.19M and revenue of 243.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

ALAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 80.31M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

KNSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. reported a net income of 25.43M and revenue of 243.60M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALAB and KNSA have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALAB has higher volatility (34.17%) compared to KNSA (26.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs KNSA's -83.06%.

KNSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAB and KNSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer