PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAB vs. BKV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALAB vs. BKV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and BKV Corp (BKV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 150.70% return, which is significantly higher than BKV's -9.58% return.


ALAB

1D
11.31%
1M
40.03%
YTD
150.70%
6M
153.69%
1Y
348.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKV

1D
1.74%
1M
-13.22%
YTD
-9.58%
6M
-8.16%
1Y
1.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAB vs. BKV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
150.70%25.60%154.22%
BKV
BKV Corp
-9.58%14.17%28.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAB and BKV is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALAB:

$75.56B

BKV:

$2.51B

EPS

ALAB:

$1.48

BKV:

$3.24

PE Ratio

ALAB:

280.93

BKV:

7.58

PS Ratio

ALAB:

75.08

BKV:

2.07

PB Ratio

ALAB:

50.57

BKV:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALAB:

$1.00B

BKV:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALAB:

$760.99M

BKV:

$693.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALAB:

$253.12M

BKV:

$544.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAB vs. BKV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAB
ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BKV
BKV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BKV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BKV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAB vs. BKV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and BKV Corp (BKV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALABBKVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.04

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.34

0.04

+5.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.53

0.10

+10.43

ALAB vs. BKV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the BKV Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAB and BKV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALAB vs. BKV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than BKV's maximum drawdown of -39.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and BKV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALABBKVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-39.98%

-23.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.19%

-24.97%

-35.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-23.66%

+23.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.29%

-11.63%

-17.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.50%

10.50%

+20.00%

Volatility

ALAB vs. BKV - Volatility Comparison

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a higher volatility of 31.61% compared to BKV Corp (BKV) at 9.27%. This indicates that ALAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALABBKVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.61%

9.27%

+22.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.77%

26.17%

+43.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.74%

43.42%

+53.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.67%

43.28%

+50.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.67%

43.28%

+50.39%

Dividends

ALAB vs. BKV - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAB nor BKV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALAB vs. BKV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astera Labs, Inc. and BKV Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
308.36M
432.85M
(ALAB) Total Revenue
(BKV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALAB vs. BKV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Astera Labs, Inc. and BKV Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
76.3%
93.7%
Portfolio components
ALAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.14M and revenue of 308.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

BKV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BKV Corp reported a gross profit of 405.49M and revenue of 432.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.7%.

ALAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.83M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

BKV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BKV Corp reported an operating income of 86.03M and revenue of 432.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

ALAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 80.31M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

BKV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BKV Corp reported a net income of 44.08M and revenue of 432.85M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALAB and BKV have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALAB has higher volatility (31.61%) compared to BKV (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs BKV's -39.98%.

ALAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAB and BKV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer