AKAF vs. VT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AKAF (The Frontier Economic Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - AKAF tracks the Alaska Last Frontier Index while VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AKAF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

AKAF vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Frontier Economic Fund (AKAF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKAF achieves a 11.65% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return.

AKAF

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 2.37%
• YTD: 11.65%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKAF vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund	11.65%	16.79%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.24%	11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AKAF and VT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

AKAF vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKAF vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Frontier Economic Fund (AKAF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AKAF	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.25	0.44	+1.82

Drawdowns

AKAF vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKAF drawdown since its inception was -9.32%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAF and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AKAF	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.32%	-50.27%	+40.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.67%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-0.88%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-7.02%	+5.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AKAF	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	12.70%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.66%	16.05%	-1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.66%	17.23%	-2.57%

AKAF vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AKAF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AKAF vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

AKAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund	2.11%	2.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AKAF and VT in my portfolio?

AKAF and VT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AKAF or VT?

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AKAF or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AKAF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AKAF or VT?

AKAF has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

What is the main difference between AKAF and VT?

AKAF tracks Alaska Last Frontier Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Prospr Aligned and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AKAF and 0.06% for VT.