PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJG vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AJG vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, AJG has outperformed T with an annualized return of 19.74%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


AJG

1D
-0.09%
1M
18.50%
6M
-1.25%
YTD
-1.36%
1Y
-18.08%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
13.67%
10Y*
19.74%
ALL TIME*
12.61%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJG vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-1.36%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%25.04%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AJG and T is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984

0.22

The correlation between AJG and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AJG:

$65.18B

T:

$152.52B

EPS

AJG:

$5.74

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

AJG:

44.21

T:

7.19

PEG Ratio

AJG:

4.58

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

AJG:

4.74

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

AJG:

$13.94B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AJG:

$7.63B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

AJG:

$3.66B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJG vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJG vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AJGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.92

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

-0.46

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

-1.03

+0.25

AJG vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJG Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is comparable to the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJG and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AJG vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-64.15%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.59%

-28.89%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

-28.89%

-15.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

-32.01%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.40%

-42.35%

-2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.31%

-21.57%

-4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-15.74%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.05%

12.94%

+10.11%

Volatility

AJG vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 9.59%. This indicates that AJG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.92%

9.59%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.11%

19.91%

+4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.72%

23.72%

+6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.42%

24.38%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

23.92%

-0.68%

Dividends

AJG vs. T - Dividend Comparison

AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.06%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

AJG vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
3.63B
33.47B
(AJG) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AJG and T have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJG dropped -57.49% vs T's -64.15%.

T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJG and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer