PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJG vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AJG vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a -14.95% return, which is significantly lower than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AJG has outperformed T with an annualized return of 18.56%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


AJG

1D
-1.00%
1M
14.28%
YTD
-14.95%
6M
-13.82%
1Y
-30.92%
3Y*
2.53%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
18.56%

T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJG vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-14.95%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%25.04%
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AJG and T is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984

0.22

The correlation between AJG and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AJG:

$5.74

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

AJG:

38.12

T:

7.74

PEG Ratio

AJG:

3.95

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

AJG:

4.08

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

AJG:

$13.94B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AJG:

$7.63B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

AJG:

$3.66B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJG vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJG vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AJGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.92

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.59

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-1.22

-0.08

AJG vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJG Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is lower than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJG and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AJG vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-64.15%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.64%

-21.87%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

-21.87%

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

-32.01%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.40%

-42.35%

-2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.46%

-18.12%

-18.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-15.72%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.87%

10.64%

+13.23%

Volatility

AJG vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and AT&T Inc. (T) have volatilities of 8.37% and 8.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

8.21%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.48%

17.80%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

22.13%

+5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

24.01%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

23.73%

-0.65%

Dividends

AJG vs. T - Dividend Comparison

AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than T's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.23%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

AJG vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
3.63B
33.47B
(AJG) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AJG and T have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJG dropped -57.49% vs T's -64.15%.

T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJG and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer