PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJG vs. GILD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AJG vs. GILD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a -14.95% return, which is significantly lower than GILD's 2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, AJG has outperformed GILD with an annualized return of 18.56%, while GILD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.84% annualized return.


AJG

1D
-1.00%
1M
14.28%
YTD
-14.95%
6M
-13.82%
1Y
-30.92%
3Y*
2.53%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
18.56%

GILD

1D
-0.22%
1M
-5.61%
YTD
2.90%
6M
5.60%
1Y
15.06%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJG vs. GILD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-14.95%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%25.04%
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.90%36.59%18.68%-1.99%23.63%29.95%-6.70%7.88%-9.92%2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AJG and GILD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1992

0.22

The correlation between AJG and GILD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AJG:

$5.74

GILD:

$7.35

PE Ratio

AJG:

38.12

GILD:

17.09

PEG Ratio

AJG:

3.95

GILD:

0.04

PS Ratio

AJG:

4.08

GILD:

5.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

AJG:

$13.94B

GILD:

$29.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AJG:

$7.63B

GILD:

$18.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

AJG:

$3.66B

GILD:

$12.88B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJG vs. GILD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

GILD
GILD Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJG vs. GILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AJGGILDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.12

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

0.70

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

1.99

-3.28

AJG vs. GILD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJG Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is lower than the GILD Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJG and GILD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AJG vs. GILD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum GILD drawdown of -70.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and GILD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJGGILDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-70.83%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.64%

-21.59%

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

-26.59%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

-26.59%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.40%

-30.47%

-13.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.46%

-18.93%

-17.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-22.15%

+9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.87%

7.61%

+16.26%

Volatility

AJG vs. GILD - Volatility Comparison

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) at 7.95%. This indicates that AJG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJGGILDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

7.95%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.48%

19.02%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

26.62%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

24.12%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

25.52%

-2.44%

Dividends

AJG vs. GILD - Dividend Comparison

AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than GILD's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.23%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.54%2.57%3.33%3.70%3.40%3.91%4.67%3.88%3.65%2.90%2.57%1.27%

Financials

AJG vs. GILD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Gilead Sciences, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
3.63B
6.96B
(AJG) Total Revenue
(GILD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AJG vs. GILD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Gilead Sciences, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.1%
1.1%
Portfolio components
AJG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.

GILD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.

AJG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

GILD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

AJG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

GILD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AJG and GILD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to GILD (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJG dropped -57.49% vs GILD's -70.83%.

GILD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJG and GILD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer