PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJAN vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AJAN vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJAN achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 4.87% return.


AJAN

1D
0.09%
1M
0.58%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.43%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISWN

1D
0.57%
1M
1.77%
YTD
4.87%
6M
5.68%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJAN vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AJAN and ISWN is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024

0.54

The correlation between AJAN and ISWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJAN vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJAN
AJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJAN vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AJANISWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.19

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

1.33

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

4.47

+9.34

AJAN vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJAN and ISWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AJANISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.05

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

0.02

+1.72

Drawdowns

AJAN vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJAN and ISWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJANISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-32.35%

+28.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-9.63%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-3.49%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-16.16%

+15.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

2.86%

-2.42%

Volatility

AJAN vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) is 0.65%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that AJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJANISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

4.64%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

10.11%

-8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

12.19%

-9.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.80%

11.67%

-7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

11.57%

-7.77%

AJAN vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

AJAN vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

AJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AJAN
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.80%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


AJAN and ISWN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISWN has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to AJAN (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJAN dropped -4.11% vs ISWN's -32.35%.

On 1-year performance, ISWN leads with 12.73% vs 6.13% for AJAN. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISWN has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AJAN.

ISWN has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.00% for AJAN.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AJAN and 0.49% for ISWN.

AJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJAN and ISWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer