AJAN vs. BUFC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026) and BUFC (AB Conservative Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AJAN returned 6.13% vs 8.82% for BUFC. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BUFC.

Performance

AJAN vs. BUFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJAN achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than BUFC's 2.99% return.

AJAN

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFC

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 2.99%
• 6M: 3.43%
• 1Y: 8.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJAN vs. BUFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026	2.03%	6.12%	7.78%
BUFC AB Conservative Buffer ETF	2.99%	5.50%	10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AJAN and BUFC is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024	0.67

The correlation between AJAN and BUFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AJAN vs. BUFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJAN

AJAN Risk / Return Rank: 78
AJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
AJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 74

BUFC

BUFC Risk / Return Rank: 61
BUFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BUFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BUFC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BUFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
BUFC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJAN vs. BUFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AJAN	BUFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.09	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.08	2.96	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.40	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	2.44	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.81	10.44	+3.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AJAN vs. BUFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the BUFC Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJAN and BUFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AJAN	BUFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	2.09	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	1.43	+0.31

Drawdowns

AJAN vs. BUFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum BUFC drawdown of -8.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJAN and BUFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AJAN	BUFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-8.29%	+4.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.24%	-3.62%	+1.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	0.00%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.29%	-0.75%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.85%	-0.41%

Volatility

AJAN vs. BUFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) is 0.65%, while AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that AJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AJAN	BUFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.65%	0.98%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.05%	3.37%	-1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36%	4.25%	-1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.80%	5.63%	-1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.80%	5.63%	-1.83%

AJAN vs. BUFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

AJAN vs. BUFC - Dividend Comparison

Neither AJAN nor BUFC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AJAN and BUFC in my portfolio?

AJAN and BUFC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AJAN or BUFC?

BUFC has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to AJAN (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJAN dropped -4.11% vs BUFC's -8.29%.

Which ETF is better, AJAN or BUFC?

On 1-year performance, BUFC leads with 8.82% vs 6.13% for AJAN. On fees, BUFC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AJAN or BUFC?

Over the 1-year period, BUFC has performed better with a 8.82% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AJAN or BUFC?

BUFC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AJAN or BUFC?

AJAN and BUFC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AJAN and BUFC?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AJAN and 0.69% for BUFC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.