PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFC vs. EMOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFC vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFC achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 19.51% return.


BUFC

1D
0.14%
1M
1.85%
YTD
0.83%
6M
2.91%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMOP

1D
0.44%
1M
8.11%
YTD
19.51%
6M
22.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFC vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BUFC
AB Conservative Buffer ETF
0.83%5.64%
EMOP
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
19.51%16.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFC and EMOP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFC vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFC
BUFC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BUFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

EMOP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFC vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFCEMOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.16

BUFC vs. EMOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFCEMOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

2.65

-1.33

Drawdowns

BUFC vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFC drawdown since its inception was -8.29%, smaller than the maximum EMOP drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFC and EMOP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFCEMOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-12.88%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-2.01%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

Volatility

BUFC vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFCEMOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

18.89%

-14.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.75%

18.89%

-13.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.75%

18.89%

-13.14%

BUFC vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFC vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison

BUFC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.