PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIYY vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIYY vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIYY achieves a -31.40% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.


AIYY

1D
-5.93%
1M
0.59%
YTD
-31.40%
6M
-34.77%
1Y
-59.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
22.87%
6M
22.87%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIYY vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AIYY
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF
-31.40%-58.98%-14.74%0.41%
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.87%19.65%3.13%-5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between AIYY and ISCMF is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2023

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIYY vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIYY
AIYY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AIYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIYY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
AIYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIYY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIYY vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIYYISCMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

2.31

-1.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

5.53

-6.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

11.95

-13.14

AIYY vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIYY Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIYY and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIYY vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIYY drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIYY and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIYYISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.48%

-25.42%

-54.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.33%

-5.69%

-62.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.59%

-5.26%

-72.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.62%

-13.36%

-28.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.51%

2.63%

+46.88%

Volatility

AIYY vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) has a higher volatility of 15.31% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 5.11%. This indicates that AIYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIYYISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.31%

5.11%

+10.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.32%

15.45%

+23.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.14%

17.87%

+36.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.33%

14.29%

+36.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.33%

14.29%

+36.04%

AIYY vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIYY vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

AIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 153.63%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AIYY
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF
153.63%168.33%98.26%
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIYY and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIYY has higher volatility (15.31%) compared to ISCMF (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIYY dropped -79.48% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 31.30% vs -59.20% for AIYY. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 31.30% return vs -59.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AIYY.

AIYY has the higher dividend yield at 153.63%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

AIYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AIYY and 0.19% for ISCMF.

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIYY and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer