PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIXA.DE vs. LRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIXA.DE vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in AIXTRON SE (AIXA.DE) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIXA.DE is traded in EUR, while LRCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LRCX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIXA.DE achieves a 232.66% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's 80.86% return. Over the past 10 years, AIXA.DE has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 26.71%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 45.05% annualized return.


AIXA.DE

1D
-4.84%
1M
15.23%
YTD
232.66%
6M
213.80%
1Y
354.54%
3Y*
26.33%
5Y*
28.63%
10Y*
26.71%

LRCX

1D
-9.13%
1M
4.07%
YTD
80.86%
6M
93.34%
1Y
257.41%
3Y*
67.90%
5Y*
38.81%
10Y*
45.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIXA.DE vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIXA.DE
AIXTRON SE
232.66%15.01%-59.96%44.99%52.70%26.16%67.27%1.43%-27.39%273.67%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
80.86%110.78%-0.70%82.97%-37.05%65.16%50.65%124.29%-20.85%54.55%

Correlation

The correlation between AIXA.DE and LRCX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIXA.DE vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIXA.DE
AIXA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AIXA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIXA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIXA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AIXA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIXA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIXA.DE vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AIXTRON SE (AIXA.DE) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIXA.DELRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.59

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.49

13.87

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.98

47.60

-16.62

AIXA.DE vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIXA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 5.60, which is comparable to the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 5.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIXA.DE and LRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIXA.DELRCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.60

5.18

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.86

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

1.02

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.63

-0.44

Drawdowns

AIXA.DE vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIXA.DE drawdown since its inception was -97.57%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -70.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIXA.DE and LRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIXA.DELRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.57%

-70.00%

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.45%

-18.68%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.94%

-47.73%

-28.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.94%

-49.56%

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.94%

-49.56%

-26.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.04%

-11.17%

-10.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.56%

-17.86%

-57.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.50%

5.43%

+6.07%

Volatility

AIXA.DE vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

AIXTRON SE (AIXA.DE) has a higher volatility of 21.52% compared to Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 17.03%. This indicates that AIXA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIXA.DELRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.52%

17.03%

+4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.06%

40.32%

+7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.49%

50.05%

+13.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.23%

45.29%

+5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.97%

44.41%

+6.56%

Dividends

AIXA.DE vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

AIXA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than LRCX's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIXA.DE
AIXTRON SE
0.26%0.87%2.63%0.80%1.11%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.33%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%

Financials

AIXA.DE vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AIXTRON SE and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. AIXA.DE values in EUR, LRCX values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


AIXA.DE and LRCX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIXA.DE and LRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer