PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. VFVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVL vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly lower than VFVA's 19.47% return.


AIVL

1D
0.41%
1M
0.73%
6M
11.74%
YTD
16.26%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
8.44%
ALL TIME*
8.37%

VFVA

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.08%
6M
14.51%
YTD
19.47%
1Y
37.96%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$552.10K$822.97K$521.55K
$2.76M$2.45M$1.67M

AIVL vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
16.26%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%24.30%-5.82%24.40%-9.14%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
19.47%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%25.42%-18.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and VFVA is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.86

The correlation between AIVL and VFVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVL vs. VFVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVL
VFVA

Technology

22.4%
14.5%

Financial Services

17.3%
25.7%

Industrials

15.2%
7.6%

Healthcare

11.9%
14.9%

Utilities

8.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
7.1%

Basic Materials

4.8%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.8%
6.2%

Energy

3.2%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
13.1%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.4%

Technology

AIVL
22.4%
VFVA
14.5%

Financial Services

AIVL
17.3%
VFVA
25.7%

Industrials

AIVL
15.2%
VFVA
7.6%

Healthcare

AIVL
11.9%
VFVA
14.9%

Utilities

AIVL
8.9%
VFVA

-

Consumer Defensive

AIVL
7.8%
VFVA
7.1%

Basic Materials

AIVL
4.8%
VFVA
3.3%

Communication Services

AIVL
3.8%
VFVA
6.2%

Energy

AIVL
3.2%
VFVA
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVL
3.1%
VFVA
13.1%

Real Estate

AIVL
1.4%
VFVA
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIVL vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVLVFVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

4.19

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

14.15

-3.70

AIVL vs. VFVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the VFVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and VFVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, which is greater than VFVA's maximum drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and VFVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLVFVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-48.58%

-13.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-8.55%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-24.07%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-24.07%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.29%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-7.24%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.52%

-0.62%

Volatility

AIVL vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) is 3.29%, while Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that AIVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVLVFVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

4.31%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

10.12%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

14.96%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

20.05%

-5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.33%

24.20%

-6.87%

AIVL vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVL vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than VFVA's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.45%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.77%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVL and VFVA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFVA has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to AIVL (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs VFVA's -48.58%.

On 5-year performance, VFVA leads with 12.45% vs 8.79% for AIVL. On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, AIVL has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFVA has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.45% for AIVL.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.13% for VFVA.

VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVL and VFVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer