AIVL vs. EQRR
AIVL (WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund) and EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. AIVL is actively managed, while EQRR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIVL returned 7.05%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for EQRR. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIVL charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQRR.
Performance
AIVL vs. EQRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than EQRR's 28.12% return.
AIVL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
EQRR
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 28.12%
- 6M
- 27.54%
- 1Y
- 44.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- —
AIVL vs. EQRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIVL WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund | 10.60% | 9.72% | 13.49% | 7.17% | -7.26% | 24.30% | -5.82% | 24.40% | -9.57% | 7.94% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 28.12% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 19.57% | -18.60% | 15.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIVL and EQRR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between AIVL and EQRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIVL vs. EQRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIVL
EQRR
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
AIVL
EQRR
Technology
AIVL
EQRR
Industrials
AIVL
EQRR
Healthcare
AIVL
EQRR
-
Utilities
AIVL
EQRR
-
Consumer Defensive
AIVL
EQRR
-
Basic Materials
AIVL
EQRR
-
Communication Services
AIVL
EQRR
Consumer Cyclical
AIVL
EQRR
Energy
AIVL
EQRR
Real Estate
AIVL
EQRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIVL vs. EQRR — Risk / Return Rank
AIVL
EQRR
AIVL vs. EQRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIVL | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.59 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 8.94 | -6.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 33.32 | -24.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIVL | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 3.30 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.59 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.43 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
AIVL vs. EQRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, which is greater than EQRR's maximum drawdown of -57.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and EQRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIVL | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.48% | -57.93% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -4.95% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -17.75% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.08% | -21.75% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -10.07% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.33% | +0.61% |
Volatility
AIVL vs. EQRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) is 2.98%, while ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that AIVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIVL | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 4.69% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.62% | 10.36% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 13.48% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 21.39% | -6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 24.86% | -7.52% |
AIVL vs. EQRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than EQRR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIVL vs. EQRR - Dividend Comparison
AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than EQRR's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIVL WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund | 1.45% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 2.43% | 2.08% | 2.75% | 3.55% | 3.25% | 4.18% | 3.16% | 3.20% | 3.41% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIVL and EQRR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to AIVL (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs EQRR's -57.93%.
On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 12.47% vs 7.05% for AIVL. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AIVL has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.
AIVL has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.35% for EQRR.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIVL and EQRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer