PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVI vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVI vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVI achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -21.29% return.


AIVI

1D
1.38%
1M
4.91%
6M
11.97%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
9.30%
ALL TIME*
5.59%

GDMN

1D
1.66%
1M
-4.40%
6M
-30.05%
YTD
-21.29%
1Y
49.41%
3Y*
54.79%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$303.68K$176.23K$114.83K
$1.47M$2.23M$3.42M

AIVI vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIVI
WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund
18.16%38.68%2.07%18.11%-9.78%1.73%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-21.29%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVI and GDMN is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.43

The correlation between AIVI and GDMN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIVI vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVI
GDMN

Financial Services

38.9%

-

Industrials

14.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.4%

-

Basic Materials

7.1%
100.0%

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%

-

Energy

5.5%

-

Utilities

4.8%

-

Technology

3.5%

-

Real Estate

3.2%

-

Communication Services

2.6%

-

Financial Services

AIVI
38.9%
GDMN

-

Industrials

AIVI
14.3%
GDMN

-

Consumer Defensive

AIVI
8.4%
GDMN

-

Basic Materials

AIVI
7.1%
GDMN
100.0%

Healthcare

AIVI
6.2%
GDMN

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIVI
5.5%
GDMN

-

Energy

AIVI
5.5%
GDMN

-

Utilities

AIVI
4.8%
GDMN

-

Technology

AIVI
3.5%
GDMN

-

Real Estate

AIVI
3.2%
GDMN

-

Communication Services

AIVI
2.6%
GDMN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVI vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIVI
AIVI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIVI vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVIGDMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.18

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

0.95

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

1.99

+8.17

AIVI vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVI Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVI and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVI vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVI drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVI and GDMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVIGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-52.82%

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-52.02%

+41.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.71%

-52.02%

+40.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-48.33%

+48.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-19.85%

+4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

24.95%

-21.85%

Volatility

AIVI vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) is 3.73%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 14.93%. This indicates that AIVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVIGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

14.93%

-11.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

49.31%

-37.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

65.05%

-51.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

48.34%

-33.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

48.34%

-32.25%

AIVI vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVI vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

AIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than GDMN's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVI
WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund
4.92%4.70%4.94%5.05%4.32%5.53%3.50%4.31%4.21%3.65%3.98%4.23%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
3.43%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVI and GDMN have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMN has higher volatility (14.93%) compared to AIVI (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVI dropped -65.98% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 54.79% vs 20.69% for AIVI. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, AIVI has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 54.79% return vs 20.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for AIVI.

AIVI has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 3.43% for GDMN.

AIVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for AIVI and 0.45% for GDMN.

AIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVI and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer