PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVC vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVC vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 49.70% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 71.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVC has outperformed BNO with an annualized return of 15.11%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.32% annualized return.


AIVC

1D
0.20%
1M
-11.76%
6M
42.52%
YTD
49.70%
1Y
85.62%
3Y*
39.05%
5Y*
15.37%
10Y*
15.11%

BNO

1D
4.10%
1M
11.98%
6M
63.20%
YTD
71.96%
1Y
59.57%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
20.87%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVC vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
49.70%39.94%18.22%39.28%-38.91%-7.23%41.45%27.78%-18.62%35.42%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
71.96%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and BNO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2016

0.15

The correlation between AIVC and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVC vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVC vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVCBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

1.74

+3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.55

5.01

+10.54

AIVC vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVC Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVC and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVCBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.11%

-87.06%

+30.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-34.46%

+16.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.55%

-34.46%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.58%

-34.46%

-19.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.11%

-75.18%

+19.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.69%

-19.01%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-40.05%

+23.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

11.93%

-6.41%

Volatility

AIVC vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) is 12.70%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.78%. This indicates that AIVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVCBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.70%

14.78%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.74%

39.30%

-10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.92%

42.92%

-9.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.09%

36.14%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

36.79%

-9.46%

AIVC vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVC vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.11%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVC and BNO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.78%) compared to AIVC (12.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVC dropped -56.11% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, AIVC leads with 15.11% vs 13.32% for BNO. On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, AIVC has been the lower-risk option at 12.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 13.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

AIVC has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

AIVC is categorized as Technology Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 1.00% for BNO.

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVC and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer