PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIUP vs. GXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIUP vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AIUP) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AIUP

1D
0.53%
1M
2.91%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXLC

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.62%
6M
8.69%
YTD
10.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIUP vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIUP and GXLC is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIUP vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AIUP) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIUP vs. GXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIUP vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIUP drawdown since its inception was -11.32%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIUP and GXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIUPGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.32%

-9.08%

-2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-1.31%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-1.57%

-1.46%

Volatility

AIUP vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIUPGXLCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.83%

13.68%

+10.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

13.68%

+10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.83%

13.68%

+10.15%

AIUP vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIUP vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

AIUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AIUP and GXLC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AIUP.

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for AIUP.

They also come from different issuers: FINQ and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AIUP and 0.02% for GXLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIUP and GXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer