AIUP vs. GXLC
AIUP (FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AIUP is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIUP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
AIUP vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AIUP
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIUP vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AIUP FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF | 13.23% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 11.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIUP and GXLC is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIUP vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AIUP) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIUP vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIUP drawdown since its inception was -11.32%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIUP and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIUP | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.32% | -9.08% | -2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -1.31% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -1.57% | -1.46% |
Volatility
AIUP vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIUP | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.83% | 13.68% | +10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 13.68% | +10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 13.68% | +10.15% |
AIUP vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIUP vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
AIUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIUP FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.63% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIUP and GXLC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AIUP.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for AIUP.
They also come from different issuers: FINQ and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AIUP and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for AIUP and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer