AIS vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

AIS vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AIS

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 35.87%
• YTD: 118.61%
• 6M: 122.65%
• 1Y: 226.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIS vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	6.73%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and ARMH is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.40

Return for Risk

AIS vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIS vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIS	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.78	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.80	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	47.43	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIS	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.24	471,500.14	-471,496.90

Drawdowns

AIS vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIS	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-1.61%	-31.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-0.40%	-5.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIS	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.00%	113.00%	-77.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.04%	113.00%	-74.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.04%	113.00%	-74.96%

AIS vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIS vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIS nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIS and ARMH in my portfolio?

AIS and ARMH have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIS or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIS or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIS or ARMH?

AIS and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AIS and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.19% for ARMH.