AIS vs. ARMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH).

AIS and ARMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AIS is an actively managed fund by VistaShares. It was launched on Dec 3, 2024. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

AIS vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AIS vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	10.96%	79.88%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	39.97%	-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 39.97% return.

AIS

• 1D: 5.94%
• 1M: -8.03%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 6M: 19.31%
• 1Y: 94.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 9.71%
• 1M: 20.77%
• YTD: 39.97%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIS vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

AIS

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

AIS vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 95
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIS vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIS	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.94	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.02	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIS	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	0.80	+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and ARMH is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AIS vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.

	TTM	2025
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.42%	2.64%

Drawdowns

AIS vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -42.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIS	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-42.04%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.75%	-13.75%	+3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-16.33%	+10.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIS	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.55%	50.59%	-14.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.11%	50.59%	-14.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.11%	50.59%	-14.48%