AIRR vs. MSTZ
AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. AIRR is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, AIRR returned 43.19% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. AIRR charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
AIRR vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.
AIRR
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 1Y
- 43.19%
- 3Y*
- 31.65%
- 5Y*
- 25.07%
- 10Y*
- 20.37%
MSTZ
- 1D
- 5.07%
- 1M
- 46.38%
- 6M
- -9.68%
- YTD
- -23.27%
- 1Y
- 282.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 23.60% | 27.92% | 6.22% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -23.27% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIRR and MSTZ is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIRR vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
AIRR
MSTZ
AIRR vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIRR | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 3.35 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 6.53 | +4.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIRR vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIRR | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -99.38% | +57.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -84.89% | +71.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.86% | -97.39% | +88.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -94.53% | +87.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 43.51% | -39.73% |
Volatility
AIRR vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) is 9.25%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that AIRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIRR | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.25% | 56.56% | -47.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.15% | 135.11% | -113.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.11% | 148.53% | -121.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.53% | 171.02% | -145.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 171.02% | -144.67% |
AIRR vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIRR vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.09% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIRR and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to AIRR (9.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs 43.19% for AIRR. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, AIRR has been the lower-risk option at 9.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs 43.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIRR and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer