PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIRR vs. IEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIRR vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly higher than IEFA's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, AIRR has outperformed IEFA with an annualized return of 22.05%, while IEFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.


AIRR

1D
0.83%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
31.74%
6M
28.77%
1Y
65.25%
3Y*
35.29%
5Y*
25.46%
10Y*
22.05%

IEFA

1D
0.18%
1M
0.85%
YTD
9.51%
6M
11.08%
1Y
20.89%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIRR vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
31.74%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
9.51%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%

Correlation

The correlation between AIRR and IEFA is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.64

The correlation between AIRR and IEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIRR vs. IEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIRR
IEFA

Industrials

84.6%
20.1%

Financial Services

9.6%
22.5%

Energy

3.8%
3.8%

Technology

0.5%
10.8%

Basic Materials

-

7.0%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.6%

Healthcare

-

9.5%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

3.6%

Industrials

AIRR
84.6%
IEFA
20.1%

Financial Services

AIRR
9.6%
IEFA
22.5%

Energy

AIRR
3.8%
IEFA
3.8%

Technology

AIRR
0.5%
IEFA
10.8%

Basic Materials

AIRR

-

IEFA
7.0%

Communication Services

AIRR

-

IEFA
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AIRR

-

IEFA
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

AIRR

-

IEFA
6.6%

Healthcare

AIRR

-

IEFA
9.5%

Real Estate

AIRR

-

IEFA
3.0%

Utilities

AIRR

-

IEFA
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIRR vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIRR vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIRRIEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.25

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

1.83

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.33

6.93

+11.40

AIRR vs. IEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the IEFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIRR and IEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIRR vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than IEFA's maximum drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and IEFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIRRIEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-34.78%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-11.50%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

-13.76%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-30.41%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

-34.78%

-7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-0.60%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-6.68%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.03%

+0.54%

Volatility

AIRR vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) at 5.50%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIRRIEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

5.50%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

13.11%

+7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.19%

15.54%

+10.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

16.61%

+8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.36%

17.31%

+9.05%

AIRR vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIRR vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison

AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than IEFA's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.24%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIRR and IEFA have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to IEFA (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs IEFA's -34.78%.

On 10-year performance, AIRR leads with 22.05% vs 9.90% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 22.05% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.

IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while IEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.07% for IEFA.

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIRR and IEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer