AIRR vs. AUSF
AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIRR returned 25.46%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for AUSF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIRR charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.
Performance
AIRR vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 9.27% return.
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 67.12%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
AUSF
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 33.97% | -22.62% |
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 9.27% | 13.69% | 16.05% | 22.26% | -0.18% | 27.48% | 1.27% | 24.06% | -11.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIRR and AUSF is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AIRR and AUSF has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AIRR vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIRR
AUSF
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
AIRR
AUSF
Financial Services
AIRR
AUSF
Energy
AIRR
AUSF
Technology
AIRR
AUSF
Basic Materials
AIRR
-
AUSF
Communication Services
AIRR
-
AUSF
Consumer Cyclical
AIRR
-
AUSF
Consumer Defensive
AIRR
-
AUSF
Healthcare
AIRR
-
AUSF
Real Estate
AIRR
-
AUSF
Utilities
AIRR
-
AUSF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIRR vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank
AIRR
AUSF
AIRR vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIRR | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.28 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 2.86 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.33 | 8.29 | +10.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIRR vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, roughly equal to the maximum AUSF drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and AUSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIRR | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -44.25% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -5.84% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.95% | -12.29% | -15.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.95% | -14.23% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | 0.00% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -4.21% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.02% | +1.55% |
Volatility
AIRR vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.70%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIRR | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 2.70% | +6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 6.72% | +14.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | 10.14% | +16.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 13.66% | +11.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 19.04% | +7.32% |
AIRR vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIRR vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison
AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than AUSF's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.69% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIRR and AUSF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to AUSF (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs AUSF's -44.25%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 13.35% for AUSF. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 13.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while AUSF is Mid Cap Value Equities. AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.27% for AUSF.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIRR and AUSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer