PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIRJ vs. ZS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIRJ vs. ZS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AirJoule Technologies Corp (AIRJ) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIRJ achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly higher than ZS's -32.78% return.


AIRJ

1D
-3.64%
1M
-12.51%
6M
31.37%
YTD
7.36%
1Y
6.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-43.82%

ZS

1D
1.89%
1M
2.63%
6M
-24.40%
YTD
-32.78%
1Y
-46.05%
3Y*
-2.43%
5Y*
-8.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.96M$5.94M$7.07M
$301.30M$351.13M$636.73M

AIRJ vs. ZS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AIRJ
AirJoule Technologies Corp
7.36%-50.53%-52.16%
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
-32.78%24.67%-9.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AIRJ and ZS is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AIRJ:

$306.25M

ZS:

$24.45B

EPS

AIRJ:

-$0.76

ZS:

-$0.48

PB Ratio

AIRJ:

0.93

ZS:

10.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

AIRJ:

$0.00

ZS:

$3.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AIRJ:

-$13.18K

ZS:

$2.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

AIRJ:

-$27.31M

ZS:

$69.08M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AirJoule Technologies Corp

Zscaler, Inc.

Return for Risk

AIRJ vs. ZS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIRJ
AIRJ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AIRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ZS
ZS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIRJ vs. ZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AirJoule Technologies Corp (AIRJ) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIRJZSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.87

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

-0.73

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.07

-1.12

+1.19

AIRJ vs. ZS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIRJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the ZS Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIRJ and ZS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIRJ vs. ZS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIRJ drawdown since its inception was -87.38%, which is greater than ZS's maximum drawdown of -76.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRJ and ZS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIRJZSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.38%

-76.41%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.91%

-64.89%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.73%

-59.00%

-19.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.77%

-33.13%

-34.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.60%

42.16%

-3.56%

Volatility

AIRJ vs. ZS - Volatility Comparison

AirJoule Technologies Corp (AIRJ) has a higher volatility of 30.91% compared to Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) at 14.07%. This indicates that AIRJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIRJZSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.91%

14.07%

+16.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.13%

58.81%

+4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.43%

60.68%

+27.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.22%

56.47%

+35.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.22%

58.62%

+33.60%

Dividends

AIRJ vs. ZS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIRJ nor ZS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AIRJ vs. ZS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AirJoule Technologies Corp and Zscaler, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AIRJ and ZS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRJ has higher volatility (30.91%) compared to ZS (14.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRJ dropped -87.38% vs ZS's -76.41%.

AIRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIRJ and ZS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer