AIRJ vs. ZS
AIRJ (AirJoule Technologies Corp) and ZS (Zscaler, Inc.) are both stocks. AIRJ operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while ZS operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, AIRJ returned 34.31% vs -50.83% for ZS. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AIRJ vs. ZS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIRJ achieves a 39.09% return, which is significantly higher than ZS's -35.91% return.
AIRJ
- 1D
- 5.38%
- 1M
- 74.52%
- YTD
- 39.09%
- 6M
- 97.12%
- 1Y
- 34.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZS
- 1D
- -7.42%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- -35.91%
- 6M
- -40.36%
- 1Y
- -50.83%
- 3Y*
- 0.41%
- 5Y*
- -4.79%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRJ vs. ZS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AIRJ AirJoule Technologies Corp | 39.09% | -50.53% | -33.62% |
ZS Zscaler, Inc. | -35.91% | 24.67% | -7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIRJ and ZS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
AIRJ:
$324.11M
ZS:
$23.17B
AIRJ:
-$0.76
ZS:
-$0.49
AIRJ:
1.21
ZS:
9.79
AIRJ:
$0.00
ZS:
$3.17B
AIRJ:
-$13.18K
ZS:
$2.43B
AIRJ:
-$27.31M
ZS:
$69.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIRJ vs. ZS — Risk / Return Rank
AIRJ
ZS
AIRJ vs. ZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AirJoule Technologies Corp (AIRJ) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIRJ | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | -0.88 | +1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | -1.08 | +2.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.83 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.74 | +1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.15 | -1.35 | +2.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIRJ | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | -0.88 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | 0.34 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
AIRJ vs. ZS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIRJ drawdown since its inception was -87.38%, which is greater than ZS's maximum drawdown of -76.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRJ and ZS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIRJ | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.38% | -76.41% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.91% | -64.89% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -64.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.45% | -60.91% | -11.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.99% | -32.57% | -32.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.03% | 35.23% | +1.80% |
Volatility
AIRJ vs. ZS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AirJoule Technologies Corp (AIRJ) is 29.03%, while Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a volatility of 45.01%. This indicates that AIRJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIRJ | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.03% | 45.01% | -15.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.31% | 56.92% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.04% | 58.55% | +21.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.58% | 56.05% | +32.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.58% | 58.42% | +30.16% |
Dividends
AIRJ vs. ZS - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIRJ nor ZS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AIRJ vs. ZS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AirJoule Technologies Corp and Zscaler, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AIRJ and ZS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZS has higher volatility (45.01%) compared to AIRJ (29.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRJ dropped -87.38% vs ZS's -76.41%.
AIRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIRJ and ZS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer