PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIQ vs. FDCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AIQ vs. FDCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AIQ vs. FDCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
-6.92%31.89%24.11%13.49%
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
-9.91%27.42%28.37%16.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a -6.92% return, which is significantly higher than FDCF's -9.91% return.


AIQ

1D
1.44%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
-6.92%
6M
-5.03%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
24.62%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*

FDCF

1D
0.62%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
-9.91%
6M
-12.31%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AIQ vs. FDCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FDCF's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AIQ vs. FDCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FDCF
FDCF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FDCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIQ vs. FDCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIQFDCFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

0.72

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.13

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.15

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

0.98

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.13

3.02

+3.11

AIQ vs. FDCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the FDCF Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQ and FDCF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIQFDCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.72

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.03

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between AIQ and FDCF is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AIQ vs. FDCF - Dividend Comparison

AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, more than FDCF's 0.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.20%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
0.04%0.09%0.25%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AIQ vs. FDCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, which is greater than FDCF's maximum drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and FDCF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AIQFDCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-22.53%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.47%

-18.10%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.70%

-13.97%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-4.16%

-5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

5.87%

-0.92%

Volatility

AIQ vs. FDCF - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a higher volatility of 8.98% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) at 8.06%. This indicates that AIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AIQFDCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.98%

8.06%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.89%

14.45%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.96%

23.02%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.97%

20.75%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.40%

20.75%

+4.65%