PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIQ vs. FDCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIQ vs. FDCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 19.09% return, which is significantly higher than FDCF's 3.11% return.


AIQ

1D
2.85%
1M
-2.07%
6M
15.64%
YTD
19.09%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
28.94%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.89%

FDCF

1D
2.27%
1M
-1.09%
6M
4.88%
YTD
3.11%
1Y
11.80%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$119.65M$125.66M$166.59M
$340.65K$346.22K$435.76K

AIQ vs. FDCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
19.09%31.89%24.11%15.68%
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
3.11%27.42%28.37%17.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AIQ and FDCF is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2023

0.85

The correlation between AIQ and FDCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIQ vs. FDCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIQ
FDCF

Technology

78.8%
36.8%

Communication Services

10.1%
48.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
9.8%

Industrials

3.6%
4.9%

Financial Services

0.5%
0.3%

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AIQ
78.8%
FDCF
36.8%

Communication Services

AIQ
10.1%
FDCF
48.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AIQ
6.6%
FDCF
9.8%

Industrials

AIQ
3.6%
FDCF
4.9%

Financial Services

AIQ
0.5%
FDCF
0.3%

Healthcare

AIQ
0.4%
FDCF

-

Basic Materials

AIQ

-

FDCF

-

Consumer Defensive

AIQ

-

FDCF

-

Energy

AIQ

-

FDCF

-

Real Estate

AIQ

-

FDCF

-

Utilities

AIQ

-

FDCF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIQ vs. FDCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FDCF
FDCF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FDCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCF Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIQ vs. FDCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIQFDCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.65

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

1.88

+3.97

AIQ vs. FDCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the FDCF Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQ and FDCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIQ vs. FDCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, which is greater than FDCF's maximum drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and FDCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIQFDCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-22.53%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.19%

-18.10%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-22.53%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.64%

-4.22%

-9.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-4.18%

-5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.76%

6.29%

+0.47%

Volatility

AIQ vs. FDCF - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) at 5.47%. This indicates that AIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIQFDCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.54%

5.47%

+5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.90%

15.71%

+9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.63%

19.77%

+8.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.45%

20.71%

+5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.99%

20.71%

+5.28%

AIQ vs. FDCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FDCF's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIQ vs. FDCF - Dividend Comparison

AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, more than FDCF's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.08%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
0.07%0.09%0.25%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIQ and FDCF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIQ has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to FDCF (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs FDCF's -22.53%.

On 3-year performance, AIQ leads with 28.94% vs 23.40% for FDCF. On fees, FDCF is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FDCF has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 28.94% return vs 23.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDCF is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

AIQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.07% for FDCF.

AIQ is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while FDCF is Communications Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.50% for FDCF.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIQ and FDCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer