AIPO vs. XLK
AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AIPO tracks the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
AIPO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 50.90% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 34.34% return.
AIPO
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 50.90%
- 6M
- 40.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 16.63%
- YTD
- 34.34%
- 6M
- 33.10%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 33.46%
- 5Y*
- 23.44%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
AIPO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 50.90% | 8.68% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 34.34% | 10.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIPO and XLK is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.76 |
AIPO vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIPO
XLK
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
-
Energy
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
AIPO
XLK
Technology
AIPO
XLK
Utilities
AIPO
XLK
-
Energy
AIPO
XLK
Financial Services
AIPO
XLK
-
Real Estate
AIPO
XLK
-
Communication Services
AIPO
XLK
-
Basic Materials
AIPO
-
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
AIPO
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
AIPO
-
XLK
-
Healthcare
AIPO
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIPO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
AIPO
XLK
AIPO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIPO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.30 | 0.41 | +1.89 |
Drawdowns
AIPO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIPO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -82.05% | +64.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -2.54% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -34.95% | +30.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility
AIPO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIPO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.02% | 20.86% | +13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.02% | 24.90% | +9.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.02% | 24.49% | +9.53% |
AIPO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIPO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than XLK's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIPO and XLK have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for AIPO and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer