AIPO vs. USO
AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - AIPO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
AIPO vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 53.75% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 98.48% return.
AIPO
- 1D
- 3.59%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 53.75%
- 6M
- 48.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 98.48%
- 6M
- 95.54%
- 1Y
- 97.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
AIPO vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 53.75% | 8.68% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 98.48% | -7.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIPO and USO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIPO vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
AIPO
USO
AIPO vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIPO | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.44 | -0.18 | +2.62 |
Drawdowns
AIPO vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIPO | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -98.19% | +80.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -85.39% | +85.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -75.30% | +70.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.81% | — |
Volatility
AIPO vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIPO | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.13% | 44.26% | -10.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.13% | 36.04% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.13% | 39.00% | -4.87% |
AIPO vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIPO vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIPO and USO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
AIPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
AIPO is categorized as Technology Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for AIPO and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer