AIPO vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Defiance - AIPO tracks the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index while QTUM tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

AIPO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIPO having a 52.03% return and QTUM slightly higher at 53.29%.

AIPO

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: 52.03%
• 6M: 45.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 23.63%
• YTD: 53.29%
• 6M: 50.69%
• 1Y: 95.36%
• 3Y*: 52.22%
• 5Y*: 29.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIPO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	52.03%	8.68%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	53.29%	17.64%

Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and QTUM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025	0.82

AIPO vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIPO	QTUM
Industrials	57.1%	9.0%
Technology	16.5%	84.2%
Utilities	14.4%	-
Energy	6.9%	-
Financial Services	3.6%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Communication Services	0.5%	5.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

AIPO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 91
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIPO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIPO	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.36	1.08	+1.28

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIPO	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.31%	-38.45%	+21.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.26%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-0.59%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.38%	-8.25%	+3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIPO	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.35%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.09%	26.26%	+7.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.09%	26.56%	+7.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.09%	27.17%	+6.92%

AIPO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIPO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.70%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIPO and QTUM in my portfolio?

AIPO and QTUM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIPO or QTUM?

On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIPO or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIPO or QTUM?

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

What is the main difference between AIPO and QTUM?

AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.40% for QTUM.