PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIOO vs. PNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIOO vs. PNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - November (PNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIOO achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than PNOV's 6.26% return.


AIOO

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.09%
6M
2.34%
YTD
2.34%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PNOV

1D
0.10%
1M
0.06%
6M
6.26%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
9.40%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIOO vs. PNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIOO and PNOV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.74

The correlation between AIOO and PNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIOO vs. PNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIOO
AIOO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PNOV
PNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIOO vs. PNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - November (PNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIOOPNOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.88

2.53

+4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.90

12.66

+7.24

AIOO vs. PNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the PNOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIOO and PNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIOO vs. PNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIOO drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum PNOV drawdown of -18.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIOO and PNOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIOOPNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-18.51%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.74%

-4.85%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.06%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-1.64%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.97%

-0.71%

Volatility

AIOO vs. PNOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) is 0.81%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - November (PNOV) has a volatility of 2.18%. This indicates that AIOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIOOPNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

2.18%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.42%

5.31%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

6.33%

-4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.06%

8.95%

-6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.06%

10.52%

-8.46%

AIOO vs. PNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIOO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIOO vs. PNOV - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIOO nor PNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AIOO and PNOV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNOV has higher volatility (2.18%) compared to AIOO (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIOO dropped -0.74% vs PNOV's -18.51%.

On 1-year performance, PNOV leads with 12.22% vs 5.07% for AIOO. On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, AIOO has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PNOV has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 5.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PNOV.

AIOO and PNOV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AIOO and 0.79% for PNOV.

AIOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIOO and PNOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer