AIOO vs. JANW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) and JANW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while JANW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIOO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for JANW.

Performance

AIOO vs. JANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIOO achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than JANW's 4.51% return.

AIOO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.11%
• YTD: 2.48%
• 6M: 2.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JANW

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 4.51%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 13.20%
• 3Y*: 10.98%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIOO vs. JANW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	2.48%	2.67%
JANW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF	4.51%	6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AIOO and JANW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

AIOO vs. JANW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANW

JANW Risk / Return Rank: 86
JANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
JANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
JANW Omega Ratio Rank: 92
JANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
JANW Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIOO vs. JANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIOO	JANW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.88	1.28	+1.60

Drawdowns

AIOO vs. JANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIOO drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum JANW drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIOO and JANW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIOO	JANW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.74%	-9.69%	+8.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.65%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-1.23%	+1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIOO	JANW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98%	4.60%	-2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.98%	6.77%	-4.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.98%	6.67%	-4.69%

AIOO vs. JANW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIOO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than JANW's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIOO vs. JANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIOO nor JANW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIOO and JANW in my portfolio?

AIOO and JANW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIOO or JANW?

On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIOO or JANW?

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JANW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIOO or JANW?

AIOO and JANW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AIOO and JANW?

AIOO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while JANW is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AIOO and 0.74% for JANW.