AINP vs. ASCE

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AINP (Allspring Income Plus ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AINP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Allspring, while ASCE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Allspring. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AINP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

AINP vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINP achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.72% return.

AINP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 6.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASCE

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 5.53%
• YTD: 22.72%
• 6M: 23.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINP vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	1.33%	3.98%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	22.72%	8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AINP and ASCE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

AINP vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINP

AINP Risk / Return Rank: 61
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINP vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AINP	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AINP	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	1.95	-0.54

Drawdowns

AINP vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINP drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum ASCE drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINP and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AINP	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-9.22%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.47%	-2.10%	+1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AINP	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.26%	19.29%	-16.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.63%	19.29%	-15.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.63%	19.29%	-15.66%

AINP vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

AINP vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

AINP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than ASCE's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	5.77%	5.03%	0.47%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.18%	0.22%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AINP and ASCE in my portfolio?

AINP and ASCE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AINP or ASCE?

On fees, AINP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AINP or ASCE?

AINP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AINP or ASCE?

AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between AINP and ASCE?

AINP is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while ASCE is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AINP and 0.38% for ASCE.