PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.L vs. EIMI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINF.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AINF.L is traded in GBP, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 38.00% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 11.96% return.


AINF.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-11.37%
6M
29.00%
YTD
38.00%
1Y
67.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
46.54%

EIMI.L

1D
-2.70%
1M
-8.85%
6M
4.62%
YTD
11.96%
1Y
24.61%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
8.28%
ALL TIME*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
£1.05M£1.47M£2.79M
£22.49M£20.87M£20.94M

AINF.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AINF.L
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
38.00%34.74%0.43%
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
11.96%22.75%-1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.L and EIMI.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024

0.71

The correlation between AINF.L and EIMI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINF.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EIMI.L
EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AINF.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AINF.LEIMI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.71

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

5.73

-1.64

AINF.L vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.L and EIMI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AINF.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and EIMI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.LEIMI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.48%

-31.70%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.48%

-14.31%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.17%

-14.31%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-8.66%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.41%

4.29%

+12.12%

Volatility

AINF.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) at 7.25%. This indicates that AINF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINF.LEIMI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

7.25%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.95%

18.81%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.63%

20.83%

+29.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.54%

17.15%

+26.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.54%

18.60%

+24.94%

AINF.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINF.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AINF.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AINF.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AINF.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AINF.L.

AINF.L is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. AINF.L tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Net Index, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.L and EIMI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer