PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AINF.AS vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AINF.AS vs. RSP

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

AINF.AS (iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AINF.AS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AINF.AS returned 94.95% vs 18.62% for RSP. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AINF.AS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.

Performance

AINF.AS vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.AS achieves a 52.66% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 10.68% return.

AINF.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
4.11%
YTD
52.66%
6M
53.84%
1Y
94.95%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

RSP

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.75%
YTD
10.68%
6M
9.38%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.AS vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
AINF.AS
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		52.66%43.70%0.17%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF		10.68%11.21%-5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.AS and RSP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Often compared with AINF.AS:
AINF.AS vs. ROBO.ASAINF.AS vs. XAID.LAINF.AS vs. SKYE.ASAINF.AS vs. IMAE.ASAINF.AS vs. EUEA.ASAINF.AS vs. IDVY.ASAINF.AS vs. CSPX.AS
Often compared with RSP:
RSP vs. SPYRSP vs. VOORSP vs. VTIRSP vs. FXAIXRSP vs. IVVRSP vs. EUSARSP vs. GSEW

Return for Risk

AINF.AS vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AINF.AS
AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.AS vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

AINF.ASRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.57
1.59

+1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.24
2.30

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.28

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.94

2.38

+5.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.58

8.99

+15.59

AINF.AS vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.AS and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AINF.AS vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.AS drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.AS and RSP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AINF.ASRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.26%

-59.92%

+32.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-7.85%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-17.81%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-21.38%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.04%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.72%

-0.82%

-3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-6.63%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

2.08%

+1.74%

Volatility

AINF.AS vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 3.69%. This indicates that AINF.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AINF.ASRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.90%

3.69%

+7.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.25%

8.72%

+12.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.20%

11.79%

+14.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.58%

16.20%

+12.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.58%

18.31%

+10.27%

AINF.AS vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINF.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

AINF.AS vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

AINF.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AINF.AS
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF		1.52%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

AINF.AS and RSP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AINF.AS.

AINF.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. AINF.AS tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.AS and 0.20% for RSP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.AS and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer