AIMS vs. TNA
AIMS (Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AIMS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Acuitas Investments, while TNA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). AIMS is actively managed, while TNA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIMS charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.
Performance
AIMS vs. TNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AIMS
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 6.75%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNA
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 55.54%
- YTD
- 60.25%
- 1Y
- 98.15%
- 3Y*
- 28.03%
- 5Y*
- -4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
AIMS vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AIMS Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF | 13.60% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 28.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIMS and TNA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIMS vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank
AIMS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TNA
AIMS vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIMS | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIMS vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIMS drawdown since its inception was -9.18%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMS and TNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIMS | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -88.09% | +78.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -65.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | -32.22% | +30.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -33.92% | +31.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.90% | — |
Volatility
AIMS vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIMS | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 58.38% | -38.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 67.53% | -47.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 68.34% | -48.33% |
AIMS vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIMS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIMS vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison
AIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIMS Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.29% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, AIMS and TNA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AIMS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIMS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.
TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for AIMS.
AIMS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Acuitas Investments and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIMS and 1.05% for TNA.
Find the right allocation for AIMS and TNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer