AIGS.L vs. IGLN.L
AIGS.L (WisdomTree Softs) and IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - AIGS.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Softs, while IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIGS.L returned 2.26%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for IGLN.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIGS.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IGLN.L.
Performance
AIGS.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGS.L achieves a -12.24% return, which is significantly lower than IGLN.L's 3.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGS.L has underperformed IGLN.L with an annualized return of 2.26%, while IGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.
AIGS.L
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -9.93%
- YTD
- -12.24%
- 6M
- -15.11%
- 1Y
- -13.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.26%
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 32.37%
- 3Y*
- 31.55%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
AIGS.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGS.L WisdomTree Softs | -12.24% | 2.96% | 25.45% | 20.14% | -4.35% | 43.50% | -0.54% | 3.02% | -21.88% | -16.48% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.70% | 64.92% | 26.14% | 13.44% | -0.09% | -4.03% | 24.16% | 18.28% | -1.31% | 11.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGS.L and IGLN.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011 | 0.12 |
The correlation between AIGS.L and IGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGS.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
AIGS.L
IGLN.L
AIGS.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Softs (AIGS.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGS.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.25 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.86 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 4.79 | -5.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGS.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 1.30 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 1.07 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.86 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.46 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
AIGS.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGS.L drawdown since its inception was -79.63%, which is greater than IGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -45.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGS.L and IGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGS.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.63% | -45.24% | -34.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.61% | -17.36% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.19% | -17.36% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -21.15% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.98% | -21.15% | -34.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.04% | -15.66% | -34.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.34% | -19.80% | -30.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.23% | 6.74% | +5.49% |
Volatility
AIGS.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Softs (AIGS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) at 6.36%. This indicates that AIGS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGS.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 6.36% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.09% | 21.73% | -6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.18% | 24.78% | -3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 17.36% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 15.54% | +4.37% |
AIGS.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIGS.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIGS.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIGS.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIGS.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGS.L.
AIGS.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while IGLN.L is Gold. AIGS.L tracks Bloomberg Softs, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGS.L and 0.25% for IGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for AIGS.L and IGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer