AIGS.L vs. SUGA.L
AIGS.L (WisdomTree Softs) and SUGA.L (WisdomTree Sugar) are both Agricultural Commodities funds from WisdomTree - AIGS.L tracks the Bloomberg Softs while SUGA.L tracks the Bloomberg Sugar. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIGS.L returned 2.26%/yr vs -2.92%/yr for SUGA.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
AIGS.L vs. SUGA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGS.L achieves a -12.24% return, which is significantly lower than SUGA.L's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGS.L has outperformed SUGA.L with an annualized return of 2.26%, while SUGA.L has yielded a comparatively lower -2.92% annualized return.
AIGS.L
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -9.93%
- YTD
- -12.24%
- 6M
- -15.11%
- 1Y
- -13.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.26%
SUGA.L
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -7.18%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- 1Y
- -17.30%
- 3Y*
- -11.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- -2.92%
AIGS.L vs. SUGA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGS.L WisdomTree Softs | -12.24% | 2.96% | 25.45% | 20.14% | -4.35% | 43.50% | -0.54% | 3.02% | -21.88% | -16.48% |
SUGA.L WisdomTree Sugar | -3.17% | -17.47% | -5.25% | 23.23% | 11.54% | 23.41% | 6.59% | -0.53% | -24.60% | -27.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGS.L and SUGA.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2006 | 0.65 |
The correlation between AIGS.L and SUGA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.71 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGS.L vs. SUGA.L — Risk / Return Rank
AIGS.L
SUGA.L
AIGS.L vs. SUGA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Softs (AIGS.L) and WisdomTree Sugar (SUGA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGS.L | SUGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.90 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.79 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | -1.31 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGS.L | SUGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | -0.70 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.05 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | -0.11 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.10 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
AIGS.L vs. SUGA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGS.L drawdown since its inception was -79.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SUGA.L drawdown of -83.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGS.L and SUGA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGS.L | SUGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.63% | -83.65% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.61% | -21.69% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.19% | -43.76% | +16.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -43.76% | +16.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.98% | -67.83% | +11.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.04% | -68.67% | +18.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.34% | -51.34% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.23% | 13.20% | -0.97% |
Volatility
AIGS.L vs. SUGA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Softs (AIGS.L) is 7.29%, while WisdomTree Sugar (SUGA.L) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that AIGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUGA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGS.L | SUGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 8.76% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.09% | 18.33% | -3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.18% | 24.70% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 25.12% | -3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 25.90% | -5.99% |
AIGS.L vs. SUGA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AIGS.L and SUGA.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
AIGS.L vs. SUGA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIGS.L nor SUGA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIGS.L and SUGA.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIGS.L and SUGA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
AIGS.L tracks Bloomberg Softs, while SUGA.L tracks Bloomberg Sugar.
Find the right allocation for AIGS.L and SUGA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer