AIGP.L vs. IGLN.L
AIGP.L (WisdomTree Precious Metals) and IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - AIGP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Precious Metals, while IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIGP.L returned 12.03%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for IGLN.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIGP.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IGLN.L.
Performance
AIGP.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGP.L achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's 3.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGP.L has underperformed IGLN.L with an annualized return of 12.03%, while IGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.
AIGP.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 48.11%
- 3Y*
- 33.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 33.05%
- 3Y*
- 31.55%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
AIGP.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGP.L WisdomTree Precious Metals | 4.36% | 78.63% | 23.25% | 7.81% | -0.87% | -7.48% | 23.72% | 17.09% | -5.55% | 7.63% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.70% | 64.92% | 26.14% | 13.44% | -0.09% | -4.03% | 24.16% | 18.28% | -1.31% | 11.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGP.L and IGLN.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011 | 0.83 |
The correlation between AIGP.L and IGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (10 years) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGP.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
AIGP.L
IGLN.L
AIGP.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGP.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.25 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.86 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 4.79 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGP.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.30 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 1.07 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.86 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.46 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
AIGP.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGP.L drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, which is greater than IGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -45.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGP.L and IGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGP.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.05% | -45.24% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.14% | -17.36% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | -17.36% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -21.15% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.53% | -21.15% | -6.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.70% | -15.66% | -5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -19.80% | -6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.41% | 6.74% | +2.67% |
Volatility
AIGP.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) at 6.36%. This indicates that AIGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGP.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 6.36% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.82% | 21.73% | +6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.70% | 24.78% | +5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 17.36% | +4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 15.54% | +4.53% |
AIGP.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIGP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIGP.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIGP.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, AIGP.L and IGLN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGP.L.
AIGP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while IGLN.L is Gold. AIGP.L tracks Bloomberg Precious Metals, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGP.L and 0.25% for IGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for AIGP.L and IGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer