PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIGO.TO is traded in CAD, while BOTZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BOTZ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


AIGO.TO

1D
-0.69%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-1.49%
1M
-5.84%
6M
-6.26%
YTD
0.57%
1Y
12.21%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIGO.TO and BOTZ is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

-0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGO.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIGO.TOBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.95

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGO.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.69%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGO.TO and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGO.TOBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-51.62%

+50.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-12.49%

+11.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-15.14%

+14.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

Volatility

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGO.TOBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.54%

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGO.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

AIGO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIGO.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.50%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIGO.TO and BOTZ have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIGO.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIGO.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

AIGO.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. AIGO.TO tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for AIGO.TO and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGO.TO and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer