PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIGO.TO is traded in CAD, while BOTZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BOTZ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGO.TO achieves a 38.42% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 12.57% return.


AIGO.TO

1D
-0.52%
1M
24.23%
YTD
38.42%
6M
36.42%
1Y
73.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.02%
YTD
12.57%
6M
13.45%
1Y
31.20%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIGO.TO and BOTZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2024

0.59

The correlation between AIGO.TO and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGO.TO
AIGO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AIGO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIGO.TOBOTZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.30

1.35

+1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.00

2.03

+1.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.24

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

1.75

+2.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.08

5.54

+7.54

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGO.TO and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIGO.TOBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

1.35

+1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.51

+1.27

Drawdowns

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGO.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGO.TO and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGO.TOBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.71%

-50.68%

+23.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.14%

-17.87%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-1.93%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-14.89%

+10.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

5.64%

0.00%

Volatility

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) have volatilities of 7.97% and 7.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGO.TOBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

7.84%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.85%

17.82%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.43%

23.28%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.21%

24.46%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.21%

23.68%

+0.53%

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGO.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIGO.TO vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

AIGO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIGO.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF
0.06%0.09%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIGO.TO and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIGO.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIGO.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

AIGO.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. AIGO.TO tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for AIGO.TO and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGO.TO and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer