AIGO.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO
AIGO.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF) and CHPS-U.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIGO.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while CHPS-U.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AIGO.TO returned 73.53% vs 135.37% for CHPS-U.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIGO.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CHPS-U.TO.
Performance
AIGO.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AIGO.TO is traded in CAD, while CHPS-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHPS-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGO.TO achieves a 38.42% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS-U.TO's 62.44% return.
AIGO.TO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 24.23%
- YTD
- 38.42%
- 6M
- 36.42%
- 1Y
- 73.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 26.43%
- YTD
- 62.44%
- 6M
- 58.58%
- 1Y
- 135.37%
- 3Y*
- 50.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIGO.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AIGO.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF | 38.42% | 24.70% | 19.81% |
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 64.94% | 44.87% | -1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGO.TO and CHPS-U.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2024 | 0.33 |
The correlation between AIGO.TO and CHPS-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGO.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AIGO.TO
CHPS-U.TO
AIGO.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGO.TO | CHPS-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.60 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 9.95 | -5.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.08 | 32.16 | -19.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGO.TO | CHPS-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | 3.91 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.64 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
AIGO.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGO.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, smaller than the maximum CHPS-U.TO drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGO.TO and CHPS-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGO.TO | CHPS-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.71% | -48.89% | +22.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.14% | -13.68% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | 0.00% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -15.05% | +10.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 4.23% | +1.41% |
Volatility
AIGO.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) is 7.97%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) has a volatility of 11.05%. This indicates that AIGO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGO.TO | CHPS-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 11.05% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 27.21% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.43% | 34.86% | -12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 38.67% | -14.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 38.67% | -14.46% |
AIGO.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIGO.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS-U.TO's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIGO.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
AIGO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while CHPS-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGO.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIGO.TO and CHPS-U.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIGO.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIGO.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS-U.TO.
AIGO.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS-U.TO is Semiconductors. AIGO.TO tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while CHPS-U.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for AIGO.TO and 0.63% for CHPS-U.TO.
Find the right allocation for AIGO.TO and CHPS-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer