AIGC.L vs. AGQ
AIGC.L (WisdomTree Broad Commodities) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - AIGC.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity, while AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIGC.L returned 5.99%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for AGQ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIGC.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.
Performance
AIGC.L vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGC.L achieves a 24.32% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -29.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGC.L has underperformed AGQ with an annualized return of 5.99%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.
AIGC.L
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 24.32%
- 6M
- 24.87%
- 1Y
- 37.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
AGQ
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- -29.18%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 149.89%
- 3Y*
- 55.60%
- 5Y*
- 15.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
AIGC.L vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGC.L WisdomTree Broad Commodities | 24.32% | 16.03% | 2.05% | -6.41% | 13.22% | 26.42% | -3.80% | 7.16% | -11.46% | 0.80% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -29.18% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -22.10% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGC.L and AGQ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2008 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGC.L vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
AIGC.L
AGQ
AIGC.L vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities (AIGC.L) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGC.L | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.33 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | 1.98 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 3.75 | +8.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGC.L | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.25 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.21 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.18 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.08 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
AIGC.L vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGC.L drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGC.L and AGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGC.L | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.92% | -98.16% | +22.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -76.21% | +69.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.23% | -76.21% | +64.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.98% | -76.21% | +49.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.00% | -76.25% | +42.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.42% | -84.96% | +47.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.02% | -79.86% | +28.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 40.19% | -37.09% |
Volatility
AIGC.L vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Broad Commodities (AIGC.L) is 5.88%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 33.59%. This indicates that AIGC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGC.L | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 33.59% | -27.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 133.69% | -118.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 120.79% | -103.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 74.68% | -56.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 65.65% | -49.89% |
AIGC.L vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIGC.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIGC.L vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIGC.L nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIGC.L and AGQ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIGC.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIGC.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for AGQ.
AIGC.L is categorized as Commodities, while AGQ is Silver. AIGC.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGC.L and 0.93% for AGQ.
Find the right allocation for AIGC.L and AGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer