AIFRX vs. ICBMX
AIFRX (abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund) and ICBMX (ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AIFRX returned 10.34%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for ICBMX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIFRX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for ICBMX.
Performance
AIFRX vs. ICBMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIFRX achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly lower than ICBMX's 17.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AIFRX has underperformed ICBMX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while ICBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
AIFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
ICBMX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 17.48%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 42.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.45%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
AIFRX vs. ICBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIFRX abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund | 12.03% | 26.92% | 2.88% | 13.10% | -7.95% | 15.61% | 1.87% | 28.41% | -9.31% | 25.24% |
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 17.48% | 15.95% | 21.25% | 11.02% | 0.50% | 30.63% | 5.53% | 22.11% | -17.38% | 16.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIFRX and ICBMX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.73 |
The correlation between AIFRX and ICBMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIFRX vs. ICBMX — Risk / Return Rank
AIFRX
ICBMX
AIFRX vs. ICBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIFRX | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 4.16 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 14.72 | -2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIFRX vs. ICBMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIFRX drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, smaller than the maximum ICBMX drawdown of -63.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFRX and ICBMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIFRX | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.38% | -63.92% | +25.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -10.10% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.76% | -26.49% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -26.49% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.38% | -48.18% | +9.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -3.98% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -17.85% | +12.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 2.85% | -1.05% |
Volatility
AIFRX vs. ICBMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) is 2.93%, while ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that AIFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIFRX | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 5.51% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 13.54% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.19% | 20.36% | -10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 20.79% | -6.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 22.33% | -6.48% |
AIFRX vs. ICBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIFRX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ICBMX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIFRX vs. ICBMX - Dividend Comparison
AIFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, less than ICBMX's 8.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIFRX abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund | 7.06% | 7.80% | 8.13% | 3.46% | 4.86% | 5.31% | 3.45% | 4.01% | 3.96% | 3.80% | 4.37% | 4.55% |
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 8.52% | 10.01% | 17.24% | 7.07% | 11.07% | 1.32% | 0.32% | 1.55% | 21.58% | 1.19% | 0.53% | 7.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIFRX and ICBMX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICBMX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to AIFRX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFRX dropped -38.38% vs ICBMX's -63.92%.
AIFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIFRX and ICBMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer