AIFD vs. TIME
AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AIFD returned 98.66% vs 23.44% for TIME. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIFD charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.
Performance
AIFD vs. TIME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIFD achieves a 49.97% return, which is significantly higher than TIME's 9.82% return.
AIFD
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 17.54%
- YTD
- 49.97%
- 6M
- 50.25%
- 1Y
- 98.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIME
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIFD vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 49.97% | 28.30% | 7.44% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.82% | 10.17% | 6.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIFD and TIME is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between AIFD and TIME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIFD vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIFD
TIME
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AIFD
TIME
Communication Services
AIFD
TIME
Industrials
AIFD
TIME
Consumer Cyclical
AIFD
TIME
Basic Materials
AIFD
-
TIME
Consumer Defensive
AIFD
-
TIME
Energy
AIFD
-
TIME
Financial Services
AIFD
-
TIME
Healthcare
AIFD
-
TIME
Real Estate
AIFD
-
TIME
-
Utilities
AIFD
-
TIME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIFD vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank
AIFD
TIME
AIFD vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIFD | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.89 | 1.78 | +2.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.36 | 2.40 | +1.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.31 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.44 | 1.80 | +6.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.74 | 6.63 | +29.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIFD | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89 | 1.78 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.80 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
AIFD vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIFD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFD and TIME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIFD | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.20% | -24.26% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -13.09% | +1.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.74% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -5.60% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 3.55% | -0.78% |
Volatility
AIFD vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) at 3.48%. This indicates that AIFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIFD | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 3.48% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.84% | 10.14% | +9.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 13.27% | +12.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 17.62% | +11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 17.62% | +11.72% |
AIFD vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIFD vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison
AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.12% | 10.02% | 15.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIFD and TIME have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIFD has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to TIME (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFD dropped -33.20% vs TIME's -24.26%.
On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 98.66% vs 23.44% for TIME. On fees, AIFD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 98.66% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIFD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.
TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.12%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.
They also come from different issuers: TCW and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIFD and 1.00% for TIME.
AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIFD and TIME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer