AIEQ vs. IPAY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY).

AIEQ and IPAY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AIEQ is an actively managed fund by ETFMG. It was launched on Oct 17, 2017. IPAY is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Mobile Payments Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2015.

Performance

AIEQ vs. IPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AIEQ vs. IPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIEQ AI Powered Equity ETF	-3.53%	13.96%	14.21%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-18.32%	-9.55%	25.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIEQ achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly higher than IPAY's -18.32% return.

AIEQ

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -4.56%
• YTD: -3.53%
• 6M: -2.63%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPAY

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -6.81%
• YTD: -18.32%
• 6M: -25.05%
• 1Y: -20.22%
• 3Y*: 1.18%
• 5Y*: -8.78%
• 10Y*: 6.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIEQ vs. IPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIEQ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IPAY's 0.75% expense ratio.

AIEQ

AI Powered Equity ETF

IPAY

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF

Return for Risk

AIEQ vs. IPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIEQ

AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 48
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 2
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIEQ vs. IPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIEQ	IPAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	-0.74	+1.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	-0.92	+2.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.88	+0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	-0.62	+1.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	-1.48	+7.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIEQ vs. IPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIEQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the IPAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIEQ and IPAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIEQ	IPAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	-0.74	+1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.21	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between AIEQ and IPAY is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AIEQ vs. IPAY - Dividend Comparison

AIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than IPAY's 0.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
AIEQ AI Powered Equity ETF	0.45%	0.43%	0.65%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.97%	0.79%	0.77%

Drawdowns

AIEQ vs. IPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIEQ drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, smaller than the maximum IPAY drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIEQ and IPAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIEQ	IPAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.19%	-51.75%	+27.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.35%	-31.31%	+15.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-51.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.85%	-40.87%	+35.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-16.36%	+12.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	13.18%	-10.01%

Volatility

AIEQ vs. IPAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is 5.35%, while ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that AIEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIEQ	IPAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.35%	7.12%	-1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.76%	17.91%	-8.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.59%	27.49%	-5.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.93%	25.79%	-5.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.93%	25.19%	-5.26%