AICFX vs. SPMO
Compare and contrast key facts about The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO).
AICFX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Jan 2, 1934. SPMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Momentum Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2015.
Performance
AICFX vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AICFX vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AICFX The Investment Company of America Class F-1 | -7.72% | 20.40% | 24.82% | 28.47% | -15.55% | 25.02% | 14.41% | 23.99% | -7.03% | 19.40% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | -5.78% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AICFX achieves a -7.72% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's -5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AICFX has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 12.61%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.16% annualized return.
AICFX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -8.81%
- YTD
- -7.72%
- 6M
- -5.67%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
SPMO
- 1D
- 3.96%
- 1M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -5.78%
- 6M
- -6.90%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 28.36%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AICFX vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AICFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AICFX vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
AICFX
SPMO
AICFX vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AICFX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.98 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.51 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.79 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 6.36 | -1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AICFX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.98 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.91 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.86 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.85 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between AICFX and SPMO is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AICFX vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
AICFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%, more than SPMO's 0.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AICFX The Investment Company of America Class F-1 | 11.48% | 10.58% | 9.26% | 4.92% | 6.06% | 6.89% | 1.60% | 6.10% | 11.19% | 7.00% | 5.40% | 8.90% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.91% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
AICFX vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AICFX drawdown since its inception was -50.91%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AICFX and SPMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AICFX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.91% | -30.95% | -19.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -12.70% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.36% | -22.74% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.09% | -30.95% | -0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.09% | -9.24% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -4.66% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.57% | -1.02% |
Volatility
AICFX vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) is 4.60%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that AICFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AICFX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 6.82% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 12.62% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 22.68% | -5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 19.06% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 20.08% | -3.57% |