AICFX vs. SWANX
Compare and contrast key facts about The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) and Schwab Core Equity Fund™ (SWANX).
AICFX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Jan 2, 1934. SWANX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996.
Performance
AICFX vs. SWANX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AICFX vs. SWANX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AICFX The Investment Company of America Class F-1 | -7.72% | 20.40% | 24.82% | 28.47% | -15.55% | 25.02% | 14.41% | 23.99% | -7.03% | 19.40% |
SWANX Schwab Core Equity Fund™ | -9.30% | 6.61% | 25.42% | 22.83% | -18.00% | 27.27% | 11.95% | 29.50% | -9.53% | 24.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AICFX achieves a -7.72% return, which is significantly higher than SWANX's -9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AICFX has outperformed SWANX with an annualized return of 12.61%, while SWANX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.70% annualized return.
AICFX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -8.81%
- YTD
- -7.72%
- 6M
- -5.67%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
SWANX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -7.74%
- YTD
- -9.30%
- 6M
- -12.09%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AICFX vs. SWANX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AICFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than SWANX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AICFX vs. SWANX — Risk / Return Rank
AICFX
SWANX
AICFX vs. SWANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) and Schwab Core Equity Fund™ (SWANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AICFX | SWANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.16 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 0.35 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.06 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 0.03 | +1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 0.10 | +4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AICFX | SWANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.16 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.47 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.59 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.45 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between AICFX and SWANX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AICFX vs. SWANX - Dividend Comparison
AICFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%, while SWANX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AICFX The Investment Company of America Class F-1 | 11.48% | 10.58% | 9.26% | 4.92% | 6.06% | 6.89% | 1.60% | 6.10% | 11.19% | 7.00% | 5.40% | 8.90% |
SWANX Schwab Core Equity Fund™ | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.37% | 2.89% | 16.55% | 28.81% | 4.67% | 2.88% | 15.23% | 11.59% | 1.66% | 17.05% |
Drawdowns
AICFX vs. SWANX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AICFX drawdown since its inception was -50.91%, roughly equal to the maximum SWANX drawdown of -51.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AICFX and SWANX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AICFX | SWANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.91% | -51.33% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -15.58% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.36% | -23.72% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.09% | -34.66% | +3.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.09% | -15.58% | +5.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -11.32% | +4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 5.00% | -2.45% |
Volatility
AICFX vs. SWANX - Volatility Comparison
The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Schwab Core Equity Fund™ (SWANX) at 4.05%. This indicates that AICFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AICFX | SWANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.05% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 11.53% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 19.14% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 16.93% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 18.09% | -1.58% |