PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AICFX vs. JBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AICFX vs. JBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AICFX achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than JBALX's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AICFX has outperformed JBALX with an annualized return of 14.24%, while JBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.14% annualized return.


AICFX

1D
1.33%
1M
0.87%
YTD
9.63%
6M
9.59%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
14.24%

JBALX

1D
0.91%
1M
1.52%
YTD
3.95%
6M
3.91%
1Y
14.87%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AICFX vs. JBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AICFX
The Investment Company of America Class F-1
9.63%20.40%24.82%28.47%-15.55%25.02%14.41%23.99%-7.03%19.40%
JBALX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A
3.95%15.00%20.78%15.45%-16.56%17.28%14.40%21.88%0.71%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AICFX and JBALX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2005

0.93

The correlation between AICFX and JBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AICFX vs. JBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AICFX
AICFX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AICFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AICFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AICFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AICFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AICFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

JBALX
JBALX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
JBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AICFX vs. JBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AICFXJBALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.81

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

7.72

+2.90

AICFX vs. JBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AICFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the JBALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AICFX and JBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AICFX vs. JBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AICFX drawdown since its inception was -50.91%, which is greater than JBALX's maximum drawdown of -33.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AICFX and JBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AICFXJBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.91%

-33.98%

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-8.12%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.42%

-11.93%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

-21.50%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

-22.49%

-8.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.16%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-5.42%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.90%

+0.38%

Volatility

AICFX vs. JBALX - Volatility Comparison

The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) at 3.58%. This indicates that AICFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AICFXJBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

3.58%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

7.57%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

9.19%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

11.41%

+4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

11.28%

+5.34%

AICFX vs. JBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AICFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than JBALX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

AICFX vs. JBALX - Dividend Comparison

AICFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than JBALX's 8.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AICFX
The Investment Company of America Class F-1
9.11%10.58%9.26%4.92%6.06%6.89%1.60%6.10%11.19%7.00%5.40%8.90%
JBALX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A
8.51%8.80%11.84%2.28%2.00%4.54%2.54%2.33%7.14%4.69%4.55%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, AICFX and JBALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AICFX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to JBALX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AICFX dropped -50.91% vs JBALX's -33.98%.

AICFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AICFX and JBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer