PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AICFX vs. ANWPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AICFX vs. ANWPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AICFX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than ANWPX's 6.76% return. Over the past 10 years, AICFX has outperformed ANWPX with an annualized return of 14.26%, while ANWPX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.41% annualized return.


AICFX

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.82%
YTD
10.10%
6M
10.03%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
14.26%

ANWPX

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.09%
YTD
6.76%
6M
7.66%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
13.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AICFX vs. ANWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AICFX
The Investment Company of America Class F-1
10.10%20.40%24.82%28.47%-15.55%25.02%14.41%23.99%-7.03%19.40%
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.76%21.33%16.76%24.63%-25.92%17.64%33.42%30.10%-5.99%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AICFX and ANWPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.92

The correlation between AICFX and ANWPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AICFX vs. ANWPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AICFX
AICFX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AICFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AICFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AICFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AICFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AICFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ANWPX
ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AICFX vs. ANWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AICFXANWPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

1.73

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

7.31

+4.30

AICFX vs. ANWPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AICFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the ANWPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AICFX and ANWPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AICFXANWPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.49

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.50

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.75

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Drawdowns

AICFX vs. ANWPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AICFX drawdown since its inception was -50.91%, roughly equal to the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -52.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AICFX and ANWPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AICFXANWPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.91%

-52.34%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-11.48%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.42%

-17.93%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

-34.45%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

-34.45%

+3.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.58%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-8.11%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.72%

-0.50%

Volatility

AICFX vs. ANWPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Investment Company of America Class F-1 (AICFX) is 3.35%, while American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that AICFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AICFXANWPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

3.98%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

10.77%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

13.39%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

17.20%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

17.83%

-1.26%

AICFX vs. ANWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AICFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

AICFX vs. ANWPX - Dividend Comparison

AICFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than ANWPX's 6.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AICFX
The Investment Company of America Class F-1
9.62%10.58%9.26%4.92%6.06%6.89%1.60%6.10%11.19%7.00%5.40%8.90%
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.16%6.57%5.13%5.36%4.16%7.01%4.13%3.67%7.59%5.50%3.86%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, AICFX and ANWPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANWPX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to AICFX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AICFX dropped -50.91% vs ANWPX's -52.34%.

AICFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AICFX and ANWPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer