PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIBU vs. XYZG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIBU vs. XYZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBU achieves a 48.05% return, which is significantly higher than XYZG's -3.28% return.


AIBU

1D
-4.35%
1M
29.93%
YTD
48.05%
6M
34.98%
1Y
109.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XYZG

1D
-11.57%
1M
-8.12%
YTD
-3.28%
6M
8.21%
1Y
-15.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBU vs. XYZG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIBU and XYZG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.54

The correlation between AIBU and XYZG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIBU vs. XYZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBU
AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

XYZG
XYZG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XYZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYZG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XYZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYZG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBU vs. XYZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIBUXYZGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.05

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

-0.23

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

-0.42

+5.93

AIBU vs. XYZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBU Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the XYZG Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBU and XYZG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIBUXYZGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

-0.17

+2.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.15

+1.10

Drawdowns

AIBU vs. XYZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBU drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, smaller than the maximum XYZG drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBU and XYZG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIBUXYZGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-69.40%

+18.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.71%

-69.40%

+20.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.35%

-45.04%

+40.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-29.06%

+15.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.91%

37.60%

-17.69%

Volatility

AIBU vs. XYZG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) is 14.56%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) has a volatility of 25.78%. This indicates that AIBU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIBUXYZGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.56%

25.78%

-11.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.96%

70.80%

-33.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.71%

92.87%

-45.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.37%

103.71%

-48.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.37%

103.71%

-48.34%

AIBU vs. XYZG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than XYZG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIBU vs. XYZG - Dividend Comparison

AIBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than XYZG's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIBU
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares
1.51%2.27%1.33%
XYZG
Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF
6.92%6.69%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIBU and XYZG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYZG has higher volatility (25.78%) compared to AIBU (14.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBU dropped -51.17% vs XYZG's -69.40%.

On 1-year performance, AIBU leads with 109.46% vs -15.62% for XYZG. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AIBU has been the lower-risk option at 14.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIBU has performed better with a 109.46% return vs -15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AIBU.

XYZG has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 1.51% for AIBU.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for AIBU and 0.75% for XYZG.

AIBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIBU and XYZG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer