AIBU vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AIBU (Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. AIBU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIBU charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

AIBU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBU achieves a 24.78% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

AIBU

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: -3.16%
• YTD: 24.78%
• 6M: 21.08%
• 1Y: 67.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares	24.78%	0.21%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AIBU and LINT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.51

AIBU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIBU	LINT
Technology	32.3%	100.0%
Communication Services	4.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.4%	-
Healthcare	0.3%	-
Industrials	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AIBU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBU

AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 34
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 26

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIBU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.34	—	—

Drawdowns

AIBU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBU drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, roughly equal to the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIBU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.17%	-49.54%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.38%	-12.86%	-6.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.79%	-20.48%	+6.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIBU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.36%	168.83%	-118.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.97%	168.83%	-112.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.97%	168.83%	-112.86%

AIBU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIBU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

AIBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares	1.79%	2.27%	1.33%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIBU and LINT in my portfolio?

AIBU and LINT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIBU or LINT?

On fees, AIBU is cheaper at 0.96% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIBU or LINT?

AIBU is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIBU or LINT?

AIBU has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

What is the main difference between AIBU and LINT?

Their fees differ too: 0.96% for AIBU and 0.97% for LINT.