PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIBU vs. DRGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIBU vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBU achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly higher than DRGN's 8.71% return.


AIBU

1D
7.06%
1M
2.59%
6M
27.87%
YTD
24.34%
1Y
44.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
51.00%

DRGN

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.13%
6M
-0.73%
YTD
8.71%
1Y
34.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$445.98K$469.28K$1.04M
$403.33K$404.08K$565.01K

AIBU vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIBU and DRGN is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIBU vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIBU
AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGN
DRGN Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DRGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRGN Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DRGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRGN Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIBU vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIBUDRGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

1.67

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

3.32

-1.27

AIBU vs. DRGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBU Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the DRGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBU and DRGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIBU vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBU drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBU and DRGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIBUDRGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-20.86%

-30.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.71%

-20.86%

-27.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.67%

-13.31%

-6.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.24%

-8.41%

-5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.67%

10.46%

+11.21%

Volatility

AIBU vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) has a higher volatility of 18.26% compared to Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) at 11.95%. This indicates that AIBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIBUDRGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.26%

11.95%

+6.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.14%

25.81%

+16.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.73%

36.59%

+16.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.16%

35.96%

+20.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.16%

35.96%

+20.20%

AIBU vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIBU vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

AIBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than DRGN's 1.12% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AIBU and DRGN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIBU has higher volatility (18.26%) compared to DRGN (11.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBU dropped -51.17% vs DRGN's -20.86%.

On 1-year performance, AIBU leads with 44.34% vs 34.60% for DRGN. On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DRGN has been the lower-risk option at 11.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIBU has performed better with a 44.34% return vs 34.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AIBU.

AIBU has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.12% for DRGN.

AIBU tracks Solactive US AI & Big Data Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for AIBU and 0.39% for DRGN.

DRGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIBU and DRGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer