PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIBAX vs. CWGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIBAX vs. CWGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) and American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBAX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than CWGIX's 15.64% return. Over the past 10 years, AIBAX has underperformed CWGIX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while CWGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.


AIBAX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
0.30%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
1.68%

CWGIX

1D
-0.69%
1M
4.99%
YTD
15.64%
6M
16.94%
1Y
32.69%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
12.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBAX vs. CWGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIBAX
American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America
-0.10%6.83%2.91%4.09%-8.02%-0.89%7.36%4.40%0.92%1.06%
CWGIX
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A
15.64%24.68%13.85%20.55%-17.32%14.74%15.31%25.32%-10.60%24.55%

Correlation

The correlation between AIBAX and CWGIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1993

-0.07

The correlation between AIBAX and CWGIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIBAX vs. CWGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBAX
AIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CWGIX
CWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBAX vs. CWGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) and American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIBAXCWGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

3.17

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

13.96

-8.55

AIBAX vs. CWGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the CWGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBAX and CWGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIBAXCWGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.47

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.74

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.75

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.69

+0.57

Drawdowns

AIBAX vs. CWGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBAX drawdown since its inception was -11.42%, smaller than the maximum CWGIX drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBAX and CWGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIBAXCWGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.42%

-54.47%

+43.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-10.52%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.99%

-15.56%

+12.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.33%

-27.18%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.42%

-32.00%

+20.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.69%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-7.13%

+5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

2.39%

-1.68%

Volatility

AIBAX vs. CWGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) is 0.97%, while American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that AIBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIBAXCWGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

4.52%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.02%

11.07%

-9.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

13.52%

-10.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.19%

15.20%

-11.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.29%

16.05%

-12.76%

AIBAX vs. CWGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CWGIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIBAX vs. CWGIX - Dividend Comparison

AIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than CWGIX's 9.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIBAX
American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America
3.86%3.87%4.00%3.01%1.63%0.91%3.25%2.59%1.66%1.21%1.72%1.85%
CWGIX
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A
9.14%10.54%7.88%3.20%2.09%6.82%1.23%2.44%7.00%6.63%4.96%3.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIBAX and CWGIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWGIX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to AIBAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBAX dropped -11.42% vs CWGIX's -54.47%.

CWGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIBAX and CWGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer