PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIBAX vs. AMECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIBAX vs. AMECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBAX achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than AMECX's 6.34% return. Over the past 10 years, AIBAX has underperformed AMECX with an annualized return of 1.70%, while AMECX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.51% annualized return.


AIBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.06%
6M
0.30%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
1.70%

AMECX

1D
0.33%
1M
0.95%
YTD
6.34%
6M
7.37%
1Y
15.78%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBAX vs. AMECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIBAX
American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America
0.06%6.83%2.91%4.09%-8.02%-0.89%7.36%4.40%0.92%1.06%
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
6.34%17.77%10.84%6.79%-6.40%17.37%4.49%18.50%-5.27%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AIBAX and AMECX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1990

0.05

Over the past year, AIBAX and AMECX have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIBAX vs. AMECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBAX
AIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AMECX
AMECX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AMECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMECX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AMECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMECX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBAX vs. AMECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIBAXAMECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.62

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.68

9.88

-4.20

AIBAX vs. AMECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the AMECX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBAX and AMECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIBAXAMECXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.24

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.83

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.80

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.72

+0.54

Drawdowns

AIBAX vs. AMECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBAX drawdown since its inception was -11.42%, smaller than the maximum AMECX drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBAX and AMECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIBAXAMECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.42%

-41.92%

+30.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-6.13%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.99%

-8.58%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.33%

-15.78%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.42%

-26.13%

+14.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.23%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-4.45%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

1.62%

-0.92%

Volatility

AIBAX vs. AMECX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) is 1.01%, while American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX) has a volatility of 2.06%. This indicates that AIBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIBAXAMECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

2.06%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

5.63%

-3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

7.17%

-4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.19%

9.45%

-5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.29%

10.68%

-7.39%

AIBAX vs. AMECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than AMECX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIBAX vs. AMECX - Dividend Comparison

AIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than AMECX's 9.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIBAX
American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America
3.86%3.87%4.00%3.01%1.63%0.91%3.25%2.59%1.66%1.21%1.72%1.85%
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
9.41%9.94%6.38%2.93%6.98%6.67%2.80%5.01%7.48%4.26%3.09%5.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIBAX and AMECX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMECX has higher volatility (2.06%) compared to AIBAX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBAX dropped -11.42% vs AMECX's -41.92%.

AMECX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIBAX and AMECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer